DKS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Dick's Sporting Goods's net margin of 7.33%. Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 38.67% beat Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 43.48%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $205.97, signalling upside risk potential of 13.95%. On the other hand Abercrombie & Fitch has an analysts' consensus of $114.04 which suggests that it could grow by 37.41%. Given that Abercrombie & Fitch has higher upside potential than Dick's Sporting Goods, analysts believe Abercrombie & Fitch is more attractive than Dick's Sporting Goods.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 1.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.207%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Abercrombie & Fitch offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dick's Sporting Goods pays 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Abercrombie & Fitch pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Abercrombie & Fitch quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $264.3M is higher than Abercrombie & Fitch's net income of $80.4M. Notably, Dick's Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.93x while Abercrombie & Fitch's PE ratio is 8.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dick's Sporting Goods is 1.10x versus 0.86x for Abercrombie & Fitch. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Foot Locker has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Dick's Sporting Goods's net margin of -20.23%. Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 38.67% beat Foot Locker's return on equity of -12.67%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $205.97, signalling upside risk potential of 13.95%. On the other hand Foot Locker has an analysts' consensus of $23.09 which suggests that it could fall by -4.03%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foot Locker has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.233%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Foot Locker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Dick's Sporting Goods pays 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Foot Locker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Foot Locker quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $264.3M is higher than Foot Locker's net income of -$363M. Notably, Dick's Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.93x while Foot Locker's PE ratio is 184.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dick's Sporting Goods is 1.10x versus 0.29x for Foot Locker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macy's has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Dick's Sporting Goods's net margin of 0.79%. Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 38.67% beat Macy's's return on equity of 12.89%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $205.97, signalling upside risk potential of 13.95%. On the other hand Macy's has an analysts' consensus of $13.89 which suggests that it could grow by 13.32%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Macy's, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Macy's.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macy's has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.152%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Macy's offers a yield of 5.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Dick's Sporting Goods pays 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Macy's pays out 32.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Macy's quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $264.3M is higher than Macy's's net income of $38M. Notably, Dick's Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.93x while Macy's's PE ratio is 6.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dick's Sporting Goods is 1.10x versus 0.15x for Macy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ulta Beauty has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Dick's Sporting Goods's net margin of 10.71%. Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 38.67% beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 50.14%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $205.97, signalling upside risk potential of 13.95%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $475.32 which suggests that it could grow by 2.08%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.088, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.798%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dick's Sporting Goods pays 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $264.3M is lower than Ulta Beauty's net income of $305.1M. Notably, Dick's Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.93x while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 18.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dick's Sporting Goods is 1.10x versus 1.90x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.