DKS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Five Below has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Dick's Sporting Goods's net margin of 13.48%. Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.46%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $211.87, signalling upside risk potential of 26.7%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $104.47 which suggests that it could fall by -2.61%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Five Below, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Five Below.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.113%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dick's Sporting Goods pays 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Five Below quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M is higher than Five Below's net income of $187.5M. Notably, Dick's Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Five Below's PE ratio is 23.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dick's Sporting Goods is 1.03x versus 1.53x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Foot Locker has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Dick's Sporting Goods's net margin of 2.18%. Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21% beat Foot Locker's return on equity of 0.42%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $211.87, signalling upside risk potential of 26.7%. On the other hand Foot Locker has an analysts' consensus of $21.47 which suggests that it could fall by -9.45%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foot Locker has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.96%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Foot Locker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Dick's Sporting Goods pays 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Foot Locker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Foot Locker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M is higher than Foot Locker's net income of $49M. Notably, Dick's Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Foot Locker's PE ratio is 182.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dick's Sporting Goods is 1.03x versus 0.28x for Foot Locker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kohl's has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Dick's Sporting Goods's net margin of 0.89%. Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21% beat Kohl's's return on equity of 2.85%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $211.87, signalling upside risk potential of 26.7%. On the other hand Kohl's has an analysts' consensus of $9.16 which suggests that it could grow by 22.51%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Kohl's, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Kohl's.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kohl's has a beta of 1.616, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.586%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Kohl's offers a yield of 21.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Dick's Sporting Goods pays 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Kohl's pays out 203.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kohl's's is not.

Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Kohl's quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M is higher than Kohl's's net income of $48M. Notably, Dick's Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Kohl's's PE ratio is 7.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dick's Sporting Goods is 1.03x versus 0.05x for Kohl's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Dick's Sporting Goods's net margin of -2.56%. Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21% beat Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.39%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $211.87, signalling upside risk potential of 26.7%. On the other hand Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.90 which suggests that it could grow by 45%. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than Dick's Sporting Goods, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than Dick's Sporting Goods.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.554, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.61%.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dick's Sporting Goods pays 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues of $340.4M. Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M is higher than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$8.7M. Notably, Dick's Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dick's Sporting Goods is 1.03x versus 0.06x for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.